SpaceX Starship update | SpaceX launches first of three rapid fire Falcon 9 flights

SpaceX Starship update | SpaceX launches first of three rapid fire Falcon 9 flights

Erc X @ErcXspace:
Starship Gazer:
Jessica Kirsh:
Corey @C_Bass3d:


Voiceover by Scott Leffler —

We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines:

Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [email protected]
To be resolved, thank you.


  1. Was the Apollo Lunar lander on the moon a time machine!? Some audio questions were answered in 0.9 of a second in official NASA tapes. That is 3 times the speed of light. 2.7 seconds to-from the moon is required (without time-travel). Some NASA questions were answered by moon astronauts 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1 seconds between question and answer. In official NASA tapes. The Lunar LEM was 3 sheets of kitchen aluminum foil thick. Yet a 10,000 lb rocket did not tear it to pieces. Grissom, 2 weeks before he died in Apollo 1 fire said the Lunar LEM was unsafe. "Staples and taped aluminum foil." Look closely at official hi-def pics of the LEM sitting on the moon. You can see admitted "Scotch tape" holding on exterior panels. NASA admits using Scotch tape! It saved weight. Temperatures of 250 heat on the moon, but Scotch taped. (Odysee com search Lunar lander or American Moon). Every country was given a moon rock. The Netherlands tested theirs, it was petrified wood. From earth. Von Braun, NAZI head of moon mission would leave at busiest times to collect meteorites in the Antarctic. Antarctica was once a forest, petrified wood "rocks" are found there to this day along with meteorites, visible in the white snow. Why did we silently retire the Apollo Saturn 5, 3-man F-1, strongest rocket every built, after complete success of moon landings? We beg Russia for their less powerful rockets. No F-1 failures, 65 times proved, 13 flights. 100% successful, most weight lifted, most distance, 250,000 miles. All other rockets lift less and mostly to 300 miles. The F-1 was promised to take us to Mars by 1985. It was quietly retired, even the blueprints lost. After complete success and reliability to the moon! For 60 years, we use old Mercury (1-man) and Gemini (2-man) Titan and Atlas rockets, upgraded. The 1950s Apollo upper stage J-2 is the Centaur. And we beg the Russians for their old 1950s rockets stronger than the Gemini, but weaker than the Apollo F-1 that took us to the moon. All other 1960s rockets are still used in America and Russia. Strong Apollo F-1 forgotten! Why? We put a lot of mass into space. We need every good rocket we have. And the F-1 was our BEST! After silent 15 years wait replaced by the Shuttle. A weak hydrogen burning rocket with solid rocket boosters (SRBs). Half a generation wait. Why? We had fully developed in 7 years, the 100% reliable, proved, most powerful F-1 that could have lifted SIX TIMES the weight. The Shuttle, 75% the weight of Apollo, but could only lift 1/6th the weight and up only 200 miles (at 3 times the cost per launch). Apollo, lifted 6 times the weight, 250,000 miles! Fastest, farthest of any rocket EVER! Both Shuttle explosions, 14 people dead from external fuel tanks and solid fuel boosters would have been prevented using the Apollo F-1s to lift the Shuttle! I've worked a government office. They keep everything! In 5 copies! The 5th, last goes to a special place; it can NEVER be lost! But all F-1 blueprints are missing. Gone! If an alien UFO landed we would take it apart and reverse engineer it. Why 60 years, we have not reverse engineered the perfect record, strongest ever F-1s still in museums? They are easily X-rayed and copied and are mostly plumbing. No. We beg Russians for their weaker than the F-1 rockets! The original tapes from the moon landings are gone! We keep the original Constitution and a bell that cracked in 1776 Philadelphia, but not record of America and human's historic first trip to the moon! Nor blueprints to the strongest rocket ever built. James Webb, the head of NASA resigned DAYS before the 1st mission to the moon. Why? Neil Armstrong resigned and was silent all his life. Why? He was shy? Who cares, that was his job! To be the triumphant first on the moon, voice of all of us. His anniversary words, "Much that is left undone", "protected by truth's protective layers." Who talks that way? He's admitting their shame. And sham. Human eyes see flashes in space. Film does not work beyond earth orbit. Both eyes and film see spots and cloudy patches from X-rays, Cosmic rays and the massive radiation of the Van Allen belts. There was NO thick lead around the moon camera. Nor lead lens! Nor around the film, going through the Van Allen belts twice! The film from the moon is perfect, spotless! As though made in Hollywood. The camera on the moon was aluminum. No insulation! It had no electric heater. -250 temperatures would have cracked and broken the plastic film as it moved through the camera. If it could even move in a frozen camera. In sunlight, +250 temperatures would have melted the plastic film inside. The LEM has bright red hypergolic fire and smoke. The same SpaceX uses and Soviet thrusters maneuvering toward the Space Station. Always the flames are visible! You've seen them. Also look at the test films showing massive billowing dark red clouds from it. But on rise from the moon, the video shows no exhaust fire or smoke, not deep red, none. And no LEM thrusters fire as it rotates and aligns to join with the command module above the moon. You must have thruster fire right when the LEM moves left, but none! LEM landing pads in pictures on the moon have no dust in them. There are not even scorch marks under any LEM in moon pics. No craters either. Though the massive 10,000 lb rocket exhaust would have thrown dust into the pads. And at least left fire scorch marks. The LEMs were noisy. The engine more powerful than a jet, inside the LEM with the 2 astronauts. Engine and astronauts separated by thin sheets of aluminum foil. NASA officially says the LEM was 3 sheets of kitchen aluminum foil thick. 12/1000th of an inch. NASA says it was so thin, "You could put your fingers through it." That engine roars and massively vibrates! They couldn't even hear themselves. Yet you never hear anything in their calm, quiet words "from the moon." 1969 was the PEAK sun activity of that 11 year cycle, that could kill people in space. The WORST time to send astronauts! (Protected by 3 sheets of aluminum foil). And one Apollo, the landing site was in the dark when they were scheduled to land. You can check the charts. The LEM cannot land in the dark! And their rules forbade it! Because it would crash in the dark! NASA always checked these details and timed launches to be exactly correct for a landing in the light. Fra Mauro, the landing site was completely in the dark at the scheduled landing time of Apollo 13! They knew they could not land! Before the launch! The sun/moon charts don't lie! Check them. Apollo 13 was totally faked! Another moon trip, video inside Apollo, when supposedly near the moon showed a full big blue earth through the window. That video is labeled by NASA, "Not for Public Showing." But was released. No Apollo moon mission ever left earth orbit! Grandpa lied! Nixon. Nazi Von Braun. 1960s American government. Vietnam. JFK killed by a magic bullet. The moon landings. CIA bs around the world. And more! Youtube hides it, but O d y s e e. com shows much evidence. Search Lunar lander. Or, 'American Moon (English)'. And while we SIT, Communist Chinese with Russians may be the TRUE first human beings to walk on the moon.

  2. Endloser Antrieb nicht nur für Weltall auch für Erde.
    Einfach Quecksilber usw. im Ring beschleunigt ähnlich wie kleiner LHC CERN dazu einer in der Gegenrichtung beschleunigend gegen aufdrehen dann auf gehenüberliegenden Seiten in selbe Richtung raus in Röhren an Ringen darim linear abbremsend mit Wasser oder Feldern in Ausgangsrichtung antreibend ohne Verlust von Hg bei Energir von Reaktor, Turbine & Generator. Als Reaktpr geht kalte Fusion durch schießen in Wasser (D2O) mit Protonen (Deuterium Zyklotrom) oder Hg bzw. Li-7 Th HTR dazu thermisch isolierbare CO2 Turbine mit saugender. Fliehkraft Kompressor Pumpe Rücklauf Kühlung (auch indirekt).
    Mit 1g+ Erdbeschleunigung nach oben können sie endlos in Luft stehenn bleiben ohne Austritte und Aufwirblung im All nach unter 1 Jahr nahe Lichtgeschwindigkeit.

  3. This narrator does other videos on YouTube that are so annoying! He blabbers on and on and doesn't get to the point till the end of a 30 minute video! String it out with irrelevant information! I think the other ones are part of the Dodo series if I remember right. Not sure its been awhile!

    A lot of the Ukrainian war clips are done by a couple different voices! There must be a videoing edit place company where people go if they need a narrator or something? !

  4. One of first cold fusions was already made 1940 shooting deuterium with cyclotron into uranium-238 (d, 2n) reaction to Np ß- to Pu-238 but also possible shooting into water (gel or ice) for D-D or D-H fusion or shooting of Hg into water (D2O) for Hg D-D punsh fusion and Hg n-spallation from collision with O etc. for Hg-197 epsilon decay gold.

    Energy surplus possible from fusion shooting protons or big nucleoses into water not loosing accelerator energy also later heat in water for CO2 compressor backflow cooled isolated turbines etc.

    Endless drive for earth and outer space lesa 1 year near c with 1g+ earth accekeration.

    Two Hg ring accelearators in opposite directions shooting out in same direction on opposites into tubes with water for linear slow down not loosing any Hg with energy from fusion or Li-7 Th HTR with CO2 turbine cycle.

  5. I've always appreciated the information cadence and the lightly bulleted segment transitions. The voice is relaxing and hits a good range of frequency that cuts neatly through most reasonable ambient noises.

  6. Sigh I want to hear a launch date for Starship and I want to see those arms grab the booster out of the air.